MGWCC #740 — “Contact Sport”
- TeamDoubleTow
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2021 1:58 pm
I had fun with this one (my answer still not confirmed).
I think I understand wrong guesses on week 1s in general.
While we haven't been trying to solve the MGWCCs for long, I have been surprised to see the week 1s are actually pretty varies. Sometimes there really isn't a mechanism per se, it's more of a theme. Some of the ones that had no mechanism, I wasn't sure of the answer I submitted.
I think I understand wrong guesses on week 1s in general.
While we haven't been trying to solve the MGWCCs for long, I have been surprised to see the week 1s are actually pretty varies. Sometimes there really isn't a mechanism per se, it's more of a theme. Some of the ones that had no mechanism, I wasn't sure of the answer I submitted.
Team DoubleTow=Ali who posts here, Alex & Maya the hound(with occasional assistance from son)
- Jeremy Smith
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:45 pm
- Location: Tampa Bay area
The amount of incorrect answers has decreased. Alternate correct solution, perhaps?
- SJMcK
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:45 pm
- Location: Stockbridge, GA
- Contact:
On the board at #268Jeremy Smith wrote: ↑Fri Aug 05, 2022 10:47 pm The amount of incorrect answers has decreased. Alternate correct solution, perhaps?
How can you tell how many incorrect answers have been submitted?
—
Steven McKinney
Steven McKinney
- DrTom
- Posts: 3840
- Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2019 6:46 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Well I have submitted something I think ought to be right. Of course I have been so bad at these lately I am never sure. Now back to the WSJCC...
NUDGES!I am always willing to give nudges where needed; metas should be about fun, not frustration. Send me what you have done so far because often you are closer than you think!
- benchen71
- Posts: 2488
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2021 8:50 pm
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
My understanding was that you compare the number of successful entries on the "This Week" tab with the number on the "Overall" tab. Currently there are 310 solvers (with @DrTom at #310) on "This Week", and 310 "Overall". So it looks like there are no wrong answers at the moment.
Or I have it completely wrong!
Check out "The MOAT MEOW Mashup Pack" here. US$10 for 14 metas that don't always abide by the "rules" of the game: asymmetry, 2-letter words, uncrossed letters, who knows. And this time there's a mega-meta!
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:05 pm
Submitted an answer and thought it was right but then no confirmation?! Looked today and I am right there. Puzzling.did he accept an alternate answer?
- ajk
- Posts: 980
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2020 4:22 pm
- Location: Colorado
This is also my understanding FWIW.benchen71 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 06, 2022 2:59 amMy understanding was that you compare the number of successful entries on the "This Week" tab with the number on the "Overall" tab. Currently there are 310 solvers (with @DrTom at #310) on "This Week", and 310 "Overall". So it looks like there are no wrong answers at the moment.
Or I have it completely wrong!
Check out this very cool project by many of your favorite muggles to raise money to fight cancer. You get a fun puzzle bundle and good causes get $. Win-win: Crosswords for Cancer
- woozy
- Posts: 2241
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:40 am
339 overall and 337 solvers. So two wrong answers. .... so who is the other person keeping me company?benchen71 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 06, 2022 2:59 amMy understanding was that you compare the number of successful entries on the "This Week" tab with the number on the "Overall" tab. Currently there are 310 solvers (with @DrTom at #310) on "This Week", and 310 "Overall". So it looks like there are no wrong answers at the moment.
Or I have it completely wrong!
I guess I should change my signature, and start promoting this meta: Hungry Little Creature. I was going to sent it to people for testing but I dropped the ball on it.
- Joe Ross
- Moderator
- Posts: 5123
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:46 am
- Location: Cincinnati
woozy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 06, 2022 1:27 pm339 overall and 337 solvers. So two wrong answers. .... so who is the other person keeping me company?benchen71 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 06, 2022 2:59 amMy understanding was that you compare the number of successful entries on the "This Week" tab with the number on the "Overall" tab. Currently there are 310 solvers (with @DrTom at #310) on "This Week", and 310 "Overall". So it looks like there are no wrong answers at the moment.
Or I have it completely wrong!
-
- Posts: 963
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2020 4:12 pm
I’ll just note that my user name on that board is appropriate. (I did get this week, with a pointer.)
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2021 7:14 pm
got this one solved yesterday, but since i so rarely have the opportunity to confirm a MGWCC victory, i didn't even think to post here until tonight.
i really liked how this one demonstrated that a puzzle *can* do a sports-derived meta mechanism (or a sports-centered theme more generally) while *also* not alienating any solvers who happen to lack pre-existing knowledge of said sports theme/sport/etc.
i will still never forgive that Sunday NYT puzzle from last month where familiarity with a specific brand of poker was, legitimately, a prerequisite for being able to solve the grid using the correct, game-based approach envisioned by the constructor/maybe by the editors.
(i.e., methodically, as opposed to just taking random rebus stabs everywhere until something, anything, hopefully triggered the "Congratulations!" popup; or, like in my case, as opposed to finally just admitting defeat and deciding that the misery wasn't worth maintaining even the personal record level of streak i'd managed to keep intact up to that point... it was a dark day, to say the least.)
i really liked how this one demonstrated that a puzzle *can* do a sports-derived meta mechanism (or a sports-centered theme more generally) while *also* not alienating any solvers who happen to lack pre-existing knowledge of said sports theme/sport/etc.
i will still never forgive that Sunday NYT puzzle from last month where familiarity with a specific brand of poker was, legitimately, a prerequisite for being able to solve the grid using the correct, game-based approach envisioned by the constructor/maybe by the editors.
(i.e., methodically, as opposed to just taking random rebus stabs everywhere until something, anything, hopefully triggered the "Congratulations!" popup; or, like in my case, as opposed to finally just admitting defeat and deciding that the misery wasn't worth maintaining even the personal record level of streak i'd managed to keep intact up to that point... it was a dark day, to say the least.)
- Head scratcher
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:12 pm
- Alvibu67
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2020 2:18 pm
Beam me up! A nice week 1. Feels good to get one after the week 5 masterpiece that I was never gonna get. Now to WSJ!
- Abide
- Moderator
- Posts: 1318
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:16 pm
- Location: Biloxi
- Contact:
Congrats @KayW --- the ultimate solo solve!
The site is just a web page, a meeting place, a clubhouse - it's the group that's special.
—Brian MacDonald
—Brian MacDonald
- jhseeman
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2020 3:33 pm
- Location: Charleston, SC
-
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2021 1:54 pm
- Location: Tennessee
- Joe Ross
- Moderator
- Posts: 5123
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 4:46 am
- Location: Cincinnati
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 5:05 pm
I got it wrong but he has me as a correct response. Thought it was odd as my entry and when I appeared on the board was at least an hour or so apart. Maybe crediting 2 "right " answers.
- BarbaraK
- Posts: 2636
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 2:37 pm
- Location: Virginia
So what was your answer?
If you want help with a meta, feel free to PM me. The more specific you are about what you have and what you want, the more likely I can help without spoiling.
(And if I help you win a mug, I’ll be especially delighted.)
(And if I help you win a mug, I’ll be especially delighted.)