Page 3 of 3
Re: MEOW #158 Can't See the Forest for the Trees
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:18 am
by KayW
DrTom wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:13 am
No, just talk to your ophthalmologist and see if he/she thinks you are a candidate. Intraocular lenses are not a "once and done" thing; if you have the money and desire they can be removed and upgraded. Fair warning though, insurance often pays for the lenses and/or operation if it is for cataracts, they are unlikely to if it is just a patient's desire to have better lenses. Additionally, the accommodating intraocular lenses do not always give the close up vision that people want. There are also multifocal intraocular that do not depend on the ciliary body, the lenses are designed to have multifocal properties. Think "multifocal contacts" except intraocular. Again, this is something that you should discuss with your specialist because I am just a reporter here, having no ophthalmologic experience other than years of bad eyesight.
Thank you for the PSA
@DrTom! I am saving this post as I am probably due for cataract surgery in about 3 years, per my ophthalmologist.
Re: MEOW #158 Can't See the Forest for the Trees
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 2:41 pm
by DrTom
KayW wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:18 am
DrTom wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:13 am
No, just talk to your ophthalmologist and see if he/she thinks you are a candidate. Intraocular lenses are not a "once and done" thing; if you have the money and desire they can be removed and upgraded. Fair warning though, insurance often pays for the lenses and/or operation if it is for cataracts, they are unlikely to if it is just a patient's desire to have better lenses. Additionally, the accommodating intraocular lenses do not always give the close up vision that people want. There are also multifocal intraocular that do not depend on the ciliary body, the lenses are designed to have multifocal properties. Think "multifocal contacts" except intraocular. Again, this is something that you should discuss with your specialist because I am just a reporter here, having no ophthalmologic experience other than years of bad eyesight.
Thank you for the PSA @DrTom! I am saving this post as I am probably due for cataract surgery in about 3 years, per my ophthalmologist.
Most welcome Kay. I could not wait until my eyes had cataracts bad enough to operate on. I have the monovision where they put a distance lens in the dominant eye and close in the other and your brain stitches them together. It isn't for everyone but it worked well for me. I went from VERY strong glasses to nothing at all since 2013. I'm having some issues now but that is because of another problem. I highly recommend it.
T
Re: MEOW #158 Can't See the Forest for the Trees
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 6:28 pm
by KayW
DrTom wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 2:41 pm
KayW wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:18 am
DrTom wrote: ↑Sun Dec 10, 2023 12:13 am
No, just talk to your ophthalmologist and see if he/she thinks you are a candidate. Intraocular lenses are not a "once and done" thing; if you have the money and desire they can be removed and upgraded. Fair warning though, insurance often pays for the lenses and/or operation if it is for cataracts, they are unlikely to if it is just a patient's desire to have better lenses. Additionally, the accommodating intraocular lenses do not always give the close up vision that people want. There are also multifocal intraocular that do not depend on the ciliary body, the lenses are designed to have multifocal properties. Think "multifocal contacts" except intraocular. Again, this is something that you should discuss with your specialist because I am just a reporter here, having no ophthalmologic experience other than years of bad eyesight.
Thank you for the PSA @DrTom! I am saving this post as I am probably due for cataract surgery in about 3 years, per my ophthalmologist.
Most welcome Kay. I could not wait until my eyes had cataracts bad enough to operate on. I have the monovision where they put a distance lens in the dominant eye and close in the other and your brain stitches them together. It isn't for everyone but it worked well for me. I went from VERY strong glasses to nothing at all since 2013. I'm having some issues now but that is because of another problem. I highly recommend it.
T
LOL Tom I feel the same - every time I get my eyes examined I ask hopefully "are we there yet?" One of these years... soon...
Re: MEOW #158 Can't See the Forest for the Trees
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 8:25 pm
by Jeremy Smith
Cat's out of the woods. Almost forgot the MEOW this week--glad I remembered. Thanks, DrT!
Re: MEOW #158 Can't See the Forest for the Trees
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2023 11:57 pm
by DrTom
and the hits just keep on coming!!!
65 edestlin
66 Jeremy Smith
67 Sendhil Revuluri
Three more, well bless my soul there are a lot of loose cats. Thanks everyone!
Re: MEOW #158 Can't See the Forest for the Trees
Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2023 11:06 am
by DrTom
The Reveal
Thank you to the MANY (69 an new record for me) solvers. I am so glad you liked it and found me a fun guy!! You get Ben tomorrow and then I am back the following week, hopefully with another popular one.