I can't say I saw it easily. I did see it suddenly -- but only after NOT seeing it suddenly for over an hour.
#67 - "Tree Rings"
- ChrisKochmanski
- Posts: 2220
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 9:51 pm
- Location: Saline, Michigan
- oldjudge
- Posts: 1640
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 4:16 am
- Location: Pasadena, CA
I had a similar experience. When I started the puzzle yesterday I was sure I knew what the mechanism would be, and I spent a half hour after I finished the grid trying to make it work; it didn’t. After I gave up the ghost I saw the right mechanism pretty quickly. I bet we both had the same idea.
- FrankieHeck
- Posts: 839
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 8:57 pm
- Location: West Virginia
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 11:49 am
In the WSJCC thread I posted a comment about learning something new in a crossword, and then seeing it in a book shortly thereafter. So it happened again! Maybe an hour after solving the PGWCC, I was reading The Lager Queen of Minnesota by J. Ryan Stradal (I picked it up for its title alone, but it turns out to be really good) and there was "Husqvarna,"* which I don't remember ever seeing/hearing before yesterday, and which was one of my Googles in the course of completing this grid. Anyway, once was a funny coincidence, but twice in a row... Is someone spying on my to-read list??
*Not a spoiler for the grid, the meta, or the book.
*Not a spoiler for the grid, the meta, or the book.
- TMart
- Posts: 820
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:13 am
- Location: Malvern, PA
Finally saw it. I was looking in the right places, just not seeing what was relevant until now.
- joequavis
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:29 pm
- Location: Windsor, Colorado
Ah got it. Similar experience to the rest of you, only it took me a little longer. Cool puzzle, and I'm getting a little better at his grids. I only needed Mr. G for. two squares!
- Scott M
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 1:10 pm
- Location: Charlottesville, VA
Got in under the wire on this one. Saw a few things yesterday that looked promising - for about 10 seconds. But something popped today while looking for the wrong mechanism. Always satisfying to get a PGW!
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.
Mark Twain
Mark Twain
- bhamren
- Posts: 243
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:15 pm
- Location: Urbana, Ohio
I am pretty sure I am right in my answer, but I have yet to get one of Peter's Metas, so we will see tomorrow. I have only done about 3 or 4 of these in the past and I have to say I am not on the same wavelength as him. This week the WSJ and MGWCC were so easy I had time so I thought why not. This too seemed easy, but time will tell.
I just looked through the past few months of puzzles on his page that I did not do. I have to say for the most part that I am glad I did not do them. I think with the MGWCC I can always see the answer of the ones I missed after the answer is given out and say I could have gotten them. With these some of them are so out there I just don't think Matt Gaffney would ever use them as a meta. Just my 2 cents.
I just looked through the past few months of puzzles on his page that I did not do. I have to say for the most part that I am glad I did not do them. I think with the MGWCC I can always see the answer of the ones I missed after the answer is given out and say I could have gotten them. With these some of them are so out there I just don't think Matt Gaffney would ever use them as a meta. Just my 2 cents.
- Cindy N
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2019 12:55 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
Did anyone else have the idea of O=ring and look at 41, see OREGON going "around" that O, but then nothing working with the others? Tripped me up to the point of disregarding utilizing that version of "ring". It took a nudge to get me to refocus on that idea and solve correctly.
- Meg
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:41 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
So close on the heels of "Pieces of Eight"where themes circled a letter. In this one themes circled o, which all cryptic solvers know is a ring. For those of you who avoid cryptics, I encourage you to try again. The brain torture makes the Aha! moment even sweeter.
Check out and support http://CrosswordsForCancer.com.
- Al Sisti
- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:28 pm
- Location: Whitesboro NY
I was a little surprised that Peter didn't mention what I assumed was the logic behind the mechanism: "the rings of a tree are only revealed when you take a cross-section."
- Meg
- Posts: 2181
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 1:41 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Wed Apr 10, 2019 5:24 pm
I also did not really think of that - at least, not directly. The wordplay came first - I noticed three or four of the pine trees with two Os, one in each side of a name that could be split into two parts - and then the connection to "rings" came later. I just thought of it as the rings being in the center. Later when I went to make the solution image I noticed that if I colored the O brown and the rest green, it would sort of evoke a tree viewed from above.
- C=64
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2020 8:29 pm
- Location: PDX
Well, I feel like a noob for not getting this one, especially after doing Al's inaugural MMM recently. Lesson learned!