Shady Characters

A weekly meta crossword created by members of the forum. Difficulty levels will vary. Hints are usually available starting Wednesday, and solutions are posted on Sunday.
User avatar
boharr
Moderator
Posts: 3417
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2019 8:57 am
Location: Westchester, NY

#41

Post by boharr »

Gotta love that Leaderboard.
Dplass
Posts: 1739
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2019 10:09 am

#42

Post by Dplass »

Submitted. Very nice. Thanks for the puzzle!
User avatar
eagle1279
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2019 7:00 pm
Location: Indianapolis

#43

Post by eagle1279 »

Off the couch with a minor quibble, awaiting confirmation. Fun puzzle!

Edit: Confirmed!
Bbaack
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Apr 13, 2019 3:30 pm
Location: Fort Collins, CO

#44

Post by Bbaack »

That was entertaining! I agree there is no doubt once you get it. Thanks for the fun start to the week!
User avatar
MarkWoychick
Site Admin
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2021 6:15 pm
Location: Boise, ID

#45

Post by MarkWoychick »

First time MMM attempt - off the couch with an assist/confirm from Dr. Tom. I wasn’t aware of this board until someone posted about it in last week’s WSJ puzzle, and I’m happy to know about it now. Thanks for the puzzle, Maddhatter5!
madhatter5
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2020 1:48 pm

#46

Post by madhatter5 »

... but followers mildly amused
https://pandorasblocks.org/crosswords-for-cancer
User avatar
woozy
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:40 am

#47

Post by woozy »

So Josh has asked me to give some nudges.

First off, TREEBEARD, the 37D from "The Lord of the Rings"

I thought that "shady" would be a pun as he was a tree creature. But in the prompt "shady" simply mean "disreputable" as one would have thought. Apparently neither "shady" nor "character" is a pun in the prompt. No puns in the prompt.

the three squares where the grid is only a letter thick, spell out a tree. I guess, that was entirely coincidental.

is probably assymetrical for a reason. I think. It'd be hard to do this mechanism with a symmetric grid. I think. Maybe, but... No, it'd be hard...

some controversy about a clue (see post #26 and #36). Apparently our parents' advice about what topics to avoid in polite conversation still holds.

by using the clue "Snooty cow villager in the video game Animal Crossing". No-one would have had any objection to that clue.

why would any-one have had any issue to the actual clue?

the whole controversy doesn't matter. And like all things that don't matter we should just erase it from our minds.

should be taken very literally.

have to spell it out for you?



By the way here a fan of 22A? He's a real character, isn't he? should we pay any attention to him?No. We shouldn't.Maybe we should just erase him from our minds.

(Okay, the first and third of those nudges aren't nudges at all so don't fret trying to find any hidden meaning in them; there is none.)
Latest meta: Surround Sound

"No, this is Thompson with a P, __ __ psychology"
User avatar
LadyBird
Posts: 940
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2020 4:20 pm
Location: Chicagoland

#48

Post by LadyBird »

Awaiting confirmation that I am off the couch. Fun mechanism!

Edit to confirm that I'm off the couch.
User avatar
sharkicicles
Posts: 1133
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 12:03 pm
Location: Chicago, Walter the Shih-Tzu's home town

#49

Post by sharkicicles »

Thought I was done but never got a response. If I’m wrong I like my answer better, so there!
User avatar
sharkicicles
Posts: 1133
Joined: Fri May 10, 2019 12:03 pm
Location: Chicago, Walter the Shih-Tzu's home town

#50

Post by sharkicicles »

@woozy i like your animal crossing idea.
hoover
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2021 7:26 pm
Location: at the intersection of grits and breakfast tacos

#51

Post by hoover »

sharkicicles wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 12:40 am @woozy i like your animal crossing idea.
Except that would alter the beauty of the solution
I don't have anything clever to say, but if I did, it would go here.
Eli
User avatar
whimsy
Posts: 3171
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 9:51 am
Location: Hopkinton MA

#52

Post by whimsy »

Finally seeing the light instead of the shadows --
Capturelightshadows.PNG
Wouldn't believe what I'd been trying to do.....
User avatar
woozy
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:40 am

#53

Post by woozy »

hoover wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 2:50 pm
sharkicicles wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 12:40 am @woozy i like your animal crossing idea.
Except that would alter the beauty of the solution
How so?
Latest meta: Surround Sound

"No, this is Thompson with a P, __ __ psychology"
User avatar
MikeyG
Posts: 1686
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2020 2:52 pm
Location: Chicago
Contact:

#54

Post by MikeyG »

I think (?) I have the mechanism, but I'm not making heads or tails of it yet!
Less cross words, more crosswords.

Solve my latest "Pun of a Kind" Meta!: 114. For What It's Worth
User avatar
Cinny
Posts: 917
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2020 2:53 pm
Location: Minoa, NY
Contact:

#55

Post by Cinny »

Needed a nudge from Cynthia, but finally got it!
Cindy Heisler
madhatter5
Posts: 673
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2020 1:48 pm

#56

Post by madhatter5 »

Solution:

If you "shade" in all the *fictional* characters (per 42A) you spell out IAGO:

For those who were put off by my inclusion of NAOMI (of which there were quite a few), I offer my sincerest of apologies. It was of course a serious lapse of judgment to include a biblical character, and I was in no way trying to express any worldview or opinion. My only goal is to amuse and entertain, and divisive things like this certainly do not fit that spirit. Let me also just say that the fault is entirely mine here - Peter only saw the grid, not the clues.
Attachments
IAGO.PNG
https://pandorasblocks.org/crosswords-for-cancer
User avatar
whimsy
Posts: 3171
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2020 9:51 am
Location: Hopkinton MA

#57

Post by whimsy »

And as it turns out, we weren't supposed to use that enigmatic ABACA entry to pick out the first, second and third letters from the names!
woozy's "Do I have to spell it out for you?" nudge only convinced me I was on the right road! :lol:
User avatar
woozy
Posts: 2664
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2020 12:40 am

#58

Post by woozy »

"And as it turns out, we weren't supposed to use that enigmatic ABACA entry to pick out the first, second and third letters from the names! "

That never even occurred to me!
Latest meta: Surround Sound

"No, this is Thompson with a P, __ __ psychology"
User avatar
Thurman8er
Posts: 393
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2019 3:05 pm
Location: Fresno, CA

#59

Post by Thurman8er »

My (almost certainly worthless) two cents:

NAOMI really tripped me up. I think if I'd gone ahead and worked more with the bottom, I would have seen the "G" and gotten the meta. But I could only see a "TA" on top and it never went anywhere.

My Masters in theology did me no favors this week. Even biblical scholars are split on the appropriate genre into which to place the book of Ruth. It actually is a fascinating topic, because how the story is classified has a profound impact on what it is actually about!

That was more than two cents. This puzzle was beautifully constructed and I really should have gotten it. GREAT work!
Post Reply